Introductions discussion

When I first joined this site a member commented on me owning “slaves” purporting that slave ownership was appalling and not wanted on this site. Whilst I appreciate each person has the right to their own opinion and to voice it, I was a little bemused by the comment as there are slaves that are members on this site, one I have seen even displays his slave registration number openly, as there are slave owners here as well. Slave ownership is an interesting subject, and in may ways is like discussing Key Holding. Some will jump up and down now having read that comment but seriously give the matter some serious consideration. Is there not some parallels between keyholding and slave ownership. A slave owner has control over their slave partly by ownership, a keyholder has control over when a sub has a release. In fact the closer you look at the two subjects the more parallels you can find. Of course the major differences is one has absolute ownership as the other has ownership of control. Certainly in slave ownership there are contracts of slavery, contracts of ownership etc and the people involved specifically the subs may be quite different to chastity slaves but they still have needs, wants, desires to be fulfilled, they require and want ownership, some even crave for it, they want to hand control of their life over to another person and be dominated and controlled. Some are registered on the International Slave Register. Some wear a collar or bracelet displaying ownership, some even wear a tattooed brand, but then again some chastity slaves do very similar over their keyholder, and then there are the keyholders that wear the key around their necks, is this not a similarity also? Many keyholders show their dominance and care for their sub even to the extent of their medical complaints and position and general well being and health, but then so do slave owners. I could go on with all the parallels but won’t bore you. But is interesting that when you look at the realities of the two subjects there are so many parallels and similarities. On a final note there is one parallel that simply can’t be disputed! and that is the fact that in both cases the slave or the sub can at any time say “up you” and walk away, despite agreements, contracts, ownership etc as all are not legally binding and we are all only “committed” to what we do as much as we want to be. So I suggest slave ownership is no worse than owning the control of deciding when, how or where a sub will cum . I shall leave it to you to ponder further!