Chastity device discussions and reviews discussion

member_e2cf48e3f4 · 2026-08-31T19:09:57.000Z · 0 replies

Reply
member_e2cf48e3f4 New member Thread starter
Posts
1
Joined
Jan 1970
2026-08-31T19:09:57.000Z #1

I’m thinking about switching from the cb6000s to an MM device. Because CB rings are chunky and less tubular, while MM devices feature thinner metal bands, I’d like some input on the spacer gap between the base ring and the cage or tube section. It seems to me that a CB style might pinch more easily, so perhaps a slightly wider gap is better for it compared to an MM setup. With my fairly loose scrotum, I feel I could manage with less than the usual 3/8 inch spacing on an MM unit. The cb6000s works fine at 1/4 inch, but that feels tight where the tube hits the scrotal area. Does anyone know if an MM device would reduce that pinch?

For those who have used both types of devices and want to share your thoughts, Cheers, r

member_452139ff8f

Share Quote Report

Write your reply

Preview

You must be logged in to post. Reading the boards never needs an account. 18+ only, non-explicit, and civil. The full board rules are short.

More in Long-distance & online

  1. Chastity and orgasm denial discussion
    member_8c1624ed3a · 2026-08-31T20:15:13.000Z
    Replies: 0
    2026-08-31T20:15:13.000Z member_8c1624ed3a
  2. Introductions discussion
    member_0e6599a415 · 2026-08-31T20:10:43.000Z
    Replies: 0
    2026-08-31T20:10:43.000Z member_0e6599a415
  3. Journals and blogs discussion
    member_d96bc86c2c · 2026-08-31T19:19:13.000Z
    Replies: 0
    2026-08-31T19:19:13.000Z member_d96bc86c2c
  4. Introductions discussion
    member_0e3d1698b4 · 2026-08-31T19:03:34.000Z
    Replies: 0
    2026-08-31T19:03:34.000Z member_0e3d1698b4
  5. Introductions discussion
    member_0baa50b34a · 2026-08-31T18:04:23.000Z
    Replies: 0
    2026-08-31T18:04:23.000Z member_0baa50b34a
  6. CB Range discussion
    member_4a831830ee · 2026-08-31T17:46:01.000Z
    Replies: 1
    2026-08-31T19:40:47.080Z member_b30a501f10