Female led relationships discussion

I naturally yield to other Mistresses regarding how they wish to handle the penises under their care. However, I have maintained that the penises of slaves, sissies, and chaste men ought to remain small. Here is why. What serves as an erection’s purpose? There are two answers. Men who are about to engage in intercourse clearly require erections. My boyfriends possess magnificent ones and utilize them to delight me. They are males; they have a right to it. Erections are also acceptable for boys engaging in masturbation. Let them enjoy their cocks. But slaves, such as my husband, are prohibited from either fucking or masturbating, which makes an erection not just superfluous but improper. Therefore, if you are neither fucking nor masturbating, why should your penis be permitted to enlarge? When one of my boyfriends visits, shouldn’t his be the sole erection in the room? If my husband also had one, how rude would that appear? An erection might also suggest that my husband considers his penis a sexual tool, which is absurd. His mouth and anus are his true sex organs, and he understands this. When I first prohibited erections, my husband struggled to comply. So I did him a kindness by locking him in chastity. He was thankful because it assisted him in obeying my command. The only moment he displayed any ungratefulness was on his initial day wearing the KTB. Following his first attempt at an erection while fitted with that device, he requested its removal. I declined. He never asked again.