- Posts
- 3
- Joined
- Jan 1970
Comparing the Birdlocked Classic and CB6000 – My Own Experience The Birdlocked – Initial Unboxing and first impressions – At a glance, the birdlocked doesn’t seem particularly remarkable. It arrives in a fairly plain white box marked by the manufacturer, containing the device itself along with the locking strap, pin, and a padlock equipped with two keys. Initially, it appears less imposing than expected; the material is easy to bend, not overly thick, and might look like it lacks the sturdiness needed for such delicate property. The padlock is stainless steel, and while the two provided keys are adequate, receiving only one locking pin can be inconvenient, as I will explain later. The Birdlocked – First Attempt at putting it on – Applying the birdlocked isn’t overly complicated. It requires some awkward maneuvering to push the testicles through the ring, but once that is done, securing the device simply involves sliding the penis through the strap and into the sheath before locking the pin properly. It’s quite straightforward. Overall, applying the birdlocked was fairly easy; with enough lubrication and a little practice, I could put it on quickly without much effort. Comfort/Practicality – The Birdlocked – This is where this device truly excels. Since there are no interlocking components, there is virtually zero chance of sensitive skin getting pinched, which can be quite painful. It remains extremely comfortable during active movement. I have walked miles with it on, ridden my bike, and even rock climbed while wearing a harness, yet I forgot the device was there about 95% of the time. If comfort is your primary concern, you should definitely consider the birdlocked. Additionally, its profile creates very little “bulge,” making it ideal for work or public settings. Security/Durability – This is where the birdlocked encounters some tough scrutiny. Because the silicone is flexible, one might argue that squeezing the material around the cock head allows for stimulation. I have tried this myself; while noticeable, I can confirm it does not lead to orgasm. However, if your keyholder demands absolutely zero stimulation, the birdlocked might be a questionable choice. It’s also worth noting that the locking strap is designed so easily cut with a sharp blade at any time, allowing removal even when the padlock remains locked. Cutting the strap renders it useless and requires replacement, serving as an emergency exit. Users seeking total security might find this escape route too tempting for long-term wear. In terms of longevity, the device itself is quite durable, showing no tears and remaining very strong. The single plastic locking pin required for function is a different matter; mine broke after about three months of consistent use, costing at least ten dollars to replace. While steel pins are available, they come at a higher price, but regardless, the standard plastic pins lack durability and will eventually break. Overall – The birdlocked offers comfort alongside decent security, making it worth serious consideration for couples exploring chastity. It shines for active users who don’t mind some stimulation and prioritize wearer ease. However, those seeking stricter devices may find its shortcomings notable. Overall, I would rate it four out of five. The CB6000 – Initial Unboxing and first impressions – The CB6000 arrives in a sleek black leather case, with all parts neatly grouped in sealed plastic bags inside. The presentation feels sophisticated and positive. At first glance, the CB6000 looks like a somewhat chaotic mix of components, rings, and plastic pieces. Despite my thorough research, I was initially intimidated by the large number of individual parts. It also includes a stainless steel padlock with three keys. Overall, it’s a good presentation, though slightly jarring. The CB6000 – First Attempt at putting it on – Donning the CB6000 for the first time is no small feat. The numerous distinct pieces must be assembled in an exact order to achieve a precise fit, meaning finding the right configuration takes time and significant practice. Although I had researched how the device works, actually applying it was another story entirely. On its behalf, the website offers an effective animation demonstrating application, which I recommend for first-time users after you figure out the assembly yourself. Fortunately, I managed to get a tight fit on my initial setup. Others might struggle more due to the many combinations of pin lengths and ring sizes. Conversely, this variety allows for a nearly custom-fitted device that gives the keyholder confidence in its security. During my first attempt, I felt what seemed like the plastic cage cracking, though closer inspection proved it was intact. I also struggled with painful skin pinching as bunched-up tissue got caught at the top of the device, preventing proper placement. After considerable effort and some frustration, I succeeded. The CB6000 – Comfort/Practicality – Surprisingly, this boy found the CB6000 comfortable. It matched the birdlocked in comfort levels; often, I forget it’s even there. The main gripe arises during application due to painful pinching, but once seated correctly, that issue disappears. Like with the birdlocked, I engaged in long walks and bike rides while wearing it, proving its practicality. One immediate observation was the padlock bouncing up and down as I walked, creating a distinct metal-on-plastic “clinking” sound. I haven’t yet determined if this can be fixed or is inherent to the design. The noise is noticeable; those with active jobs around others should consider it. Also, the bulge is larger than that of the birdlocked because the locking structure protrudes further forward, causing more prominence. This issue is minor but worth noting. Aside from the sound, the CB6000 is a highly practical device comfortable in many situations. The CB6000 – Security/Durability – If I had to choose one area where the CB6000 excels, it would be security. The variety of part sizes allows for a precise fit; with some trial and error, the wearer can achieve a very secure setup that prevents pulling out. Its solid plastic construction makes stimulation impossible as well, meaning pleasure is only felt when the device is completely removed with keyholder consent. Unlike other devices, the CB6000 lacks an emergency release function, which has both pros and cons. Security is guaranteed, perhaps even excessively so for some users. Regarding durability, it appears well-built, though I’ve read accounts of plastic cages eventually splitting. Checking the official website revealed that a standard cage replacement costs around 70
U.S. dollars, nearly half the overall purchase price. This means splitting the device is a very costly mistake. This boy would say that overall the birdlocked is more durable, as the locking pins can be cheaply replaced, and the device itself seems more durable with a silicone build. But security wise, the C6000 is the way to go as it allows for a tight fit, and ensures it stays that way. Overall – The CB6000 is a comfortable, very secure device, that is for couples who are quite serious about the chastity of the wearer. Putting on the device is more of a commitment than the birdlocked, although at a certain price considering overall the birdlocked is more comfortable and easier to use. This boy would say that the CB6000 is the more advanced, effective of the two, and that the birdlocked, while not 100% effective, is a fantastic starting place for anybody looking to experiment with male chastity. This boy will not say that one is better than the other, as both have their advantages and disadvantages. This boy hopes that his experiences with both devices can aid future people looking into the exciting and uniquely fulfilling world of chastity. Sincerely, -Penny’s Property